
Originally published: September 7, 2021
Updated: February 12, 2026
Automation remains a poorly understood concept. Yes, this is true even in the era of AI agents. In fact, because of AI agents, it’s maybe more true than ever. Many today assume automation to comprise a monolithic technology category—all automation types being essentially the same, and serving essentially the same purpose: to automate complex work. People think they can set an AI agent to work inside their organization, step away, and voila!, work is automatically done.
The truth is, automation capacities exist, as ever, on a spectrum. And confusing one level of capacity for another is where many digital transformation efforts go sideways. Task automation, for example—still the predominant type of automation available—can eliminate repetitive clicks. Workflow automation can streamline a defined sequence of steps. But neither is designed to coordinate complex, cross-functional processes—let alone empower AI agents to execute work autonomously within guardrails.
Now more than ever, understanding the difference between simple task automation, more complex workflow automation, and end-to-end agentic orchestration is a strategic necessity. If you need to brush up on the basics, we put together this primer to help.
(If you’re already up to speed with all this, read more about how exactly Tonkean orchestration enables fully autonomous AI agents.)
Task automation is the most basic kind of automation: a machine performs a single, narrowly defined task that a human used to do manually.
Examples:
Technologies like RPA (robotic process automation) and basic iPaaS connectors are typical here. They’re great at:
Task automation is like hiring a very fast, very literal intern. You tell them exactly what to do, step by step. They don’t improvise, they don’t ask questions, they don’t understand the bigger picture—but they’ll click the same buttons perfectly all day long.
Limitations:
Task automation is valuable, but if you stop here, you’re just sanding down sharp edges of individual tasks—not actually improving how people experience or execute full processes.

Workflow automation zooms out one level. Instead of automating a single action, you automate a sequence of related tasks that follow the same logic and usually involve multiple people and systems.
Examples of workflow automation:
A workflow automation tool will typically:
If task automation is a fast intern, workflow automation is a checklist with reminders. It ensures the right boxes get ticked in the right order and nudges people when it’s their turn.
Example: a simple contract workflow
With workflow automation, most notifications, transitions, and system updates here can be automated. This is already a big improvement over manual spreadsheets, email threads, or ad‑hoc Slack DMs.
But: workflow automation is still typically limited to a single, predefined workflow. It doesn’t understand the broader operational context. It doesn’t dynamically adapt when something unexpected happens. And it usually can’t handle the full complexity of enterprise processes that span multiple departments, tools, and exception paths.
This is where process orchestration comes in.

Most enterprises aren’t struggling to improve performance or process experience because one or two steps in a process are manual.
They’re struggling because the entire process is fragmented across:
In procurement, for example, a single request might touch:
In legal, a contract might pass through:
Workflow automation can help inside each slice, but it rarely connects the full picture or enforces governance across all the moving parts.
Process orchestration is about coordinating that entire picture.
A process orchestration platform like Tonkean:
Instead of automating one workflow at a time, process orchestration creates a single, cohesive operating layer on top of your existing stack.
If workflows are checklists, process orchestration is a conductor managing the entire orchestra. Each instrument (system, team, workflow) keeps doing what it’s best at—but the conductor ensures everything is coordinated in real time, in the right key, and in harmony.
Process orchestration directly addresses the three biggest problems our research consistently surfaces in operations:
Tonkean’s vertical solutions—like ProcurementWorks and LegalWorks—are built on this orchestration layer to provide out‑of‑the‑box, best‑practice processes for critical domains, while still letting you adapt them to your unique policies and systems.
If process orchestration is the conductor, agentic orchestration introduces a new kind of musician: AI agents that can play multiple instruments, learn, adapt, and even take initiative—but only within your score and your rules.
Historically, automation has been deterministic: when X happens, do Y. AI changes that equation. With LLMs and specialized models, software can now:
Agentic orchestration is about managing and coordinating AI agents across your processes so they can do real work on your behalf, safely.
Tonkean AI Agents, for example, are goal‑oriented, policy‑aware workers embedded directly into your orchestrated processes. They don’t just trigger fixed workflows; they:
If process orchestration is the conductor, Tonkean AI Agents are specialist section leaders. They not only play their own parts; they help coordinate, adjust, and even proactively handle issues before the conductor has to intervene.
You can think of these four concepts as layers of capability:
Each layer encompasses the previous one:
Tonkean’s platform is designed from the ground up for process and agentic orchestration:
This is a fundamentally different paradigm from traditional workflow or task automation tools. Instead of stitching together dozens of micro‑automations and hoping they add up to transformation, you orchestrate processes end‑to‑end and let AI agents handle the complexity.

Contracts are a perfect example of where simple workflow automation falls short.
A traditional “contract workflow” might:
Useful, but brittle. It assumes every contract fits the happy path.
Tonkean Contracts Hub, powered by agentic orchestration, goes much further:
In other words, agentic orchestration turns contract operations from a static pipeline of steps into a living, adaptive system, where AI does as much of the routine work as possible while humans focus on judgment and strategy.
In Tonkean’s research with operations, legal, and procurement leaders, one theme is consistent: everyone agrees automation and AI are critical—but many are disappointed with what they’re actually getting from first‑generation tools.
That gap usually comes from misalignment between:
If you deploy task or basic workflow automation and expect it to:
…you’ll almost certainly be disappointed.
Those are orchestration‑level and increasingly agentic‑level outcomes.
Understanding and naming these different layers gives you a clearer roadmap:
Tonkean sits at the end of the spectrum—helping enterprises evolve from scattered automations to cohesive, AI‑powered operations across legal, procurement, and beyond.
Task automation is table stakes. If you’re re‑evaluating your automation strategy today, the most important question is this: “Are we orchestrating our processes and AI agents in a way that actually makes work better for people—and safer and more efficient for the business?”
Want to learn more? Get in touch.

